色盒直播

Cambridge v-c seeks cuts to ease 拢30 million deficit

Stephen Toope cites Brexit and Augar review in all-university email explaining the need to reduce spending

Published on
March 19, 2019
Last updated
March 19, 2019
University of Cambridge
Source: iStock

The University of Cambridge is seeking to make cost savings after it announced it is on course to post a 拢30 million deficit this year.

In an email sent to about 150 departments on 19 March, vice-chancellor Stephen Toope explains how the university faces a 鈥済rowing budget deficit鈥 thanks to rising costs, the freeze of undergraduate tuition fees and a decline in quality-related research funding in real terms.

鈥淭he budget position is deteriorating rather than improving, as had previously been forecast, despite efforts to control spending over the last few years,鈥 says Professor Toope, who has led Cambridge聽since October 2017.

He explains how the university鈥檚 finance team had just completed a 10-year budget projection in February, which, along with other projections, 鈥渃onfirmed that we are now running an annual cash operating deficit of roughly 拢30 million on a total combined鈥udget of 拢1.25 billion.鈥

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

News that the UK鈥檚 richest university is likely to post a deficit is likely to highlight the precarious financial situation faced by other institutions ahead of the publication of the post-18 education聽review. The review, led by finance expert Philip Augar, is聽expected聽to report in May or June and is set to recommend that annual tuition fees in England are cut from 拢9,250 to 拢7,500.

In his email to departments, Professor Toope聽says that聽鈥渁 combination of modest requests for new funding from across the university, increases in projected costs, and a deterioration in some revenue lines boosted the forecast cash deficit to almost 拢55 million鈥, but this had since been cut to less than 拢36 million after work with heads of schools.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淎 deficit of this order 鈥 while manageable in the short term 鈥 is not sustainable in the longer term,鈥澛爏ays聽Professor Toope, who聽says聽staff had 鈥渋nherited a strong university with local, national and global influence鈥.

鈥淚t is our duty to make sure that we do at least as well in handing on to our successors. That will require financial discipline now,鈥 he聽says.

Professor Toope adds聽that 鈥渁cross the world, universities face headwinds鈥 including 鈥渋ncreased political and economic uncertainty, with a growing possibility that financial markets will decline, reducing the income generated by the university and college endowments鈥. In the UK, this would be 鈥渆xacerbated by the uncertainty posed by Brexit," he says.

鈥淒epending upon its final form, there may be additional pressure on the finances of the UK government,鈥 he continues, adding that 鈥渋nvestments in higher education may be reduced or at least remain stagnant鈥.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淚f, as publicly mooted, the review of post-18 education and funding recommends a significant reduction in tuition fees, and if the government is not able or willing to make up for that reduction through other grants, the total income of the UK university sector would fall.鈥

On the savings plans, Professor Toope聽says聽that the 鈥渂udget work will therefore not be simply an efficiency savings exercise鈥, saying that there 鈥渁re legitimate demands for improvements in total compensation; we need to maintain strong pensions; we need to find ways to provide more affordable housing for staff鈥, he says.

鈥淲e must continue to attract the most talented people to Cambridge, especially in light of increased competition nationally (where other universities have been able to use teaching revenues to cross-subsidise research) and internationally (where significantly higher levels of philanthropy or government investment are available),鈥 he says.

Cambridge鈥檚 various financial streams 鈥 including endowment income, philanthropic gifts and income from its university press 鈥 meant 鈥渂udget pressures will be manageable鈥, he says, but the university 鈥渕ust still act now so that we do not dig ourselves into a hole, and put the onus on future generations to solve a much bigger problem鈥.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

When Cambridge sneezes how ill does that make some lesser Universities? It seems the massive expansion of the Higher Education sector is to slow down and perhaps stop. It may even go into decline. Personally I view this as a "good thing" as it should result in a major review. We need clearer answers and understanding on what society sees as the purpose of Universities. What do we want the sector to deliver? How will we monitor performance? Should we split teaching from research? How should the supposed "benefits" of having Universities be paid for? Who actually benefits from the existence of our Universities? Should there be any public subsidy at all for post 18 qualifications?

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT