色盒直播

Casual conversion ruling puts universities in a quandary

Decision could put institutions on a treadmill where they can only meet teaching needs by constantly employing more casuals, court victor warns

Published on
September 23, 2026
Last updated
September 22, 2026
Swimmers with pink airbeds queue on Coogee beach in Sydney, Australia. To illustrate a landmark court decision that could force Australian universities to constantly increase their casual staff numbers to cover teaching needs.
Source: Ian Waldie/Getty Images

A landmark court decision could force Australian universities to constantly increase their casual staff numbers just to cover their routine teaching needs, according to a litigant who has thrown a spanner in the works of the sector鈥檚 employment practices.

Computing lecturer Greg Baker says his legal win, which obliged Macquarie University to convert his employment status from casual to permanent part-time, will unleash a 鈥渄eluge鈥� of copycat applications across the country.

Most will come from casual academics employed solely to teach. If they win permanent employment, their universities will have to hire them in accordance with institutional enterprise agreements 鈥� some of which limit teaching-only employment.

Consequently, the applicants might have to cut their teaching activities by up to 60 per cent, forcing their universities to employ more casuals to cover the gap. The new employees could themselves qualify for permanent conversion six months later, putting universities in the same position all over again.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

The predicament has emerged after Baker secured the first court enforcement of the 2024 鈥�employee choice鈥� rules, which entitle casual staff to permanent employment after six months of reasonably regular work meeting the ongoing needs of their employers.

Baker had been working聽at Macquarie for about 17 hours a week since early 2023, teaching introductory computing and artificial intelligence subjects. The university rejected his request to convert to permanent employment but the Fair Work Commission found that his work patterns were inconsistent with 鈥済enuine casual employment鈥�.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

Macquarie argued that it could not grant Baker permanent employment because its enterprise agreement did not permit teaching-only roles for part-time staff. Commissioner Stephen Crawford rejected this argument, finding that casual conversion rights overrode conflicting provisions in enterprise agreements.

Baker said the case would open the floodgates to casual conversion requests across the country. The latest available Department of Education statistics suggest Australia has more than 13,000 casually employed university academics on a full-time equivalent basis, performing well over 34 per cent of the sector鈥檚 teaching work.

Although聽universities might want to place their newfound permanent employees in teaching-only roles, their enterprise agreements might preclude this. 鈥淚f the university has a minimum floor on the number of teaching and research roles, and 30 per cent of the staff are casual, then they will very quickly hit that floor,鈥� Baker said.

鈥淭he universities would need to hire yet more staff. If they use casuals to fill [the] gap, then they hit the same problem six months later.鈥�

Most universities have primarily teaching academics holding what are variously described as 鈥渇ocused鈥�, 鈥渟pecialist鈥�, 鈥渋ntensive鈥� or 鈥渁ssociate鈥� education roles. But at least nine enterprise agreements place limitations on their numbers, typically capping them at between 20 and 35 per cent of continuing and fixed-term academics.

Although聽Australian university staffing data are out-of-date and often unreliable, Times Higher Education鈥檚 analysis of the available figures suggests that at least four聽institutions 鈥� Charles Sturt and Macquarie universities, Swinburne University of Technology and UNSW Sydney 鈥� would be in breach of these limitations if their teaching-only casuals converted to teaching-focused permanent positions.

Charles Sturt said it monitored developments in workplace law and industrial relations to ensure ongoing compliance with its legal obligations. 鈥淎t this stage, requests for casual conversion continue to be considered on a case-by-case basis,鈥� a spokesman said.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

UNSW said the Baker case and 鈥渘umerous other inputs鈥� influenced its 鈥渃onstant thinking around how we create more secure employment and clearer career pathways鈥�.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

Macquarie, which confirmed that it was not appealing Crawford鈥檚 judgment, said the decision highlighted 鈥渂roader challenges鈥� in the interaction between university employment practices and Australia鈥檚 industrial relations framework.

鈥淭he university sees the ruling as an opportunity to engage constructively with staff and their representatives, including the NTEU [National Tertiary Education Union], to ensure our employment arrangements are fit for purpose and provide sustainable, long-term employment and career pathways,鈥� a Macquarie spokesman said.

The NTEU said universities were 鈥渕isreading the decision鈥� if they used it to justify an expansion of teaching-only roles. 鈥淭his is one decision on one person鈥檚 circumstances, not a green light for universities to start carving teaching out of academic roles,鈥� said general secretary Damien Cahill.

鈥淩esearch is integral to teaching. The threshold standards clearly require teaching staff to keep up with developments in their fields. That can only be done through research being an important part of their job.鈥�

But Monash University policy expert Andrew Norton said the higher education funding system did not support teaching-research jobs. 鈥淵ou cannot have this contradictory model where employment is on one basis and funding is on another,鈥� he said.

Norton said the system had been 鈥減ropped up鈥� by international education revenue, which was now in decline. 鈥淚t just can鈥檛 work, in my view. Education-focused staff are absolutely essential for the system to operate.鈥�

Baker said that while universities faced a 鈥渧ery complicated problem鈥� in funding their workforce model, they had made the problem worse by 鈥減laying absolute fast and loose鈥� with rules around casual employment 鈥� which was appropriate for dealing with 鈥渞andom fluctuations鈥� in enrolments, but not for staffing core subjects such as the 鈥�850-student unit鈥� he had taught 鈥渟emester after semester鈥�.

鈥淭here is a need for casualisation to some extent...but we have we have definitely swung too far,鈥� he said. 鈥淣ow we鈥檙e doing something about it. What it looks like at the other end of that, who knows? At least we鈥檙e going to end up somewhere sustainable.鈥�

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

There are universities in other countries that dodge the requirement to upgrade employment from the exploited status of casual to permanent after six months' satisfactory service by making casual lecturers' contracts of five months' duration. The heavy use of casual lecturers is to my mind a shameful and unethical practice.
new
There is Teaching and Scholarship and Research. Good T can be sustained by granting S time for keeping up with whatever R is emerging; not sure that X to be good at T needs actually to go down the R coal-mine and hew away鈥�

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT