色盒直播

Exam board fined over issues with online English language tests

More than 9,000 results revoked after Pearson found students had been getting others to pass tests for them

Published on
December 16, 2025
Last updated
December 16, 2025
Source: Ignatiev/istock

An exam board has been fined 拢750,000 by an English regulator for allowing malpractice to occur in its English language proficiency test, used by universities聽in international student admissions.聽

Pearson was fined over 拢2 million overall for serious breaches in three separate cases between 2019 and 2023 by the Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (Ofqual).

Its Pearson Test of English (PTE Academic) is accepted by 99 per cent of UK universities to check whether international students meet entrance requirements 鈥 with an online version introduced to ease disruption from the Covid-19 pandemic.

But in 2023, the provider received reports of discrepancies between students鈥 test scores and their English proficiency from universities in the UK and Australia.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

Ofqual later found that around 5 per cent of candidates were able to take the online version of this English proficiency test at home, rather than at a secure centre, and that other people had been found to have been sitting tests on behalf of students.

Pearson discontinued the online test and revoked over 9,000 results affected, but it admitted it should have identified the malpractice sooner and reported it to Ofqual earlier than it did.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

Ofqual said the incident had an adverse effect on public confidence, with three universities no longer accepting the online test. The online test was never used for visa or migration purposes.

The 拢750,000 fine is among the highest ever issued by the regulator, reflecting the 鈥渟eriousness of Pearson鈥檚 failures鈥. The organisation was also fined 拢750,000 for a separate serious breach relating to GCSE English language qualifications and 拢505,000 for issues with its A-level Chinese awards.

Pearson has previously been reprimanded four times by Ofqual 鈥 including a 拢1.2 million fine in 2022 for failures with reviews of marking arrangements.

Amanda Swann, Ofqual鈥檚 executive director for delivery, said: 鈥淭hese fines reflect the serious nature of Pearson鈥檚 failures as well as our commitment to protecting students鈥 interests and maintaining public confidence in our qualifications system.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淪tudents must be able to trust that their results, and those of their peers taking the same qualifications, accurately reflect their performance, in line with appropriate standards. Students鈥 work must also be their own.鈥

Universities around the world have raised concerns that English language testing has become less rigorous in recent years, or that entry scores for overseas students聽increasingly bear less聽relation to the student鈥檚 ability when they arrive.

In a statement, Pearson said it takes responsibility for the incidents and has implemented robust improvements.

鈥淥ur actions at the time did not meet regulatory requirements or the high standards that learners and educators rightly expect from us.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淲e apologise to all those affected. We have learned from these incidents and continue to invest in our systems, processes, and training to ensure our qualifications are delivered to the highest possible standard.鈥

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Financial strains and the emergence of digital testing have led to concerns that anglophone universities are admitting students whose English is not good enough to allow them to succeed. But are tests really becoming less rigorous 鈥 or are universities setting pass rates that are too low? Helen Packer reports 

8 September

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT