ɫֱ

HE ‘broken’, says Braverman as she takes Reform education brief

Former home secretary puts universities ‘on notice’ after being appointed to Nigel Farage’s ‘shadow cabinet’

Published on
February 17, 2026
Last updated
February 17, 2026
Source: UK Parliament

Reform UK has announced that Suella Braverman will become the party’s education spokesperson, three weeks after she defected from the Conservatives.

Reform leader Nigel Farage announced his top team in a press conference on 17 February.

Braverman, who first served as home secretary under Liz Truss’s Conservative government in 2022, will take up the role of education, skills and equalities spokesperson.

Speaking at the conference, Braverman said she had been “passionate” about education for years, but said “too many of our universities are failing our young people”.

ɫֱ

ADVERTISEMENT

“Today, 700,000 graduates are unemployed, each of them carrying, on average, £50,000 worth of student debt.

“The truth is that too many of our young people have been sold a lie about university, wasting three years of their lives on Mickey Mouse courses, all while we have a chronic shortage of nurses, builders and care workers.”

ɫֱ

ADVERTISEMENT

She described the higher education system as “broken”, saying that 50 per cent of young people should instead be “going into the trades”.

“That’s what will produce the next generation of carpenters, electricians and technicians that our country is crying out for all to work in a thriving manufacturing sector.”

She continued: “To those universities that have descended into hotbeds of cancel culture, antisemitism, and which survive really thanks to the cache of foreign students, and keep conning young people into worthless degrees, Reform is putting you on notice.” 

After Truss’ resignation, Braverman went on to serve as home secretary again between October 2022 and November 2023 in Rishi Sunak’s government.

ɫֱ

ADVERTISEMENT

While in post, she introduced a controversial ban on most international students bringing their family members with them to the UK, which has widely been seen as driving a decline in incoming enrolments.

Zia Yusuf, Reform’s head of policy, has been appointed home affairs spokesperson. Speaking at the party’s press conference, he criticised the scale of both legal and illegal immigration to the UK.

Meanwhile, Robert Jenrick, another Conservative party detractor who has previously accused international students of using universities as a back-door immigration route, was appointed treasury spokesperson.

While Reform UK has few concrete policies related to universities, party officials have been outspoken about their views on the need to crack down on the sector.

ɫֱ

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking on a podcast in February, Matt Goodwin, a former academic who is set to stand as Reform’s candidate in an upcoming by-election, claimed universities are full of “childless women” and have become hotbeds of “politically correct authoritarianism” as a result.

He went on to criticise the “feminisation of higher education over the last 50 years”.

ɫֱ

ADVERTISEMENT

In recent months, vice-chancellors and sector groups have attempted to engage with Reform’s policy teams as the party works on a detailed manifesto.

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (7)

Nurses are qualified thanks to a University degree education, but there you go.
The system is perhaps cracking if not broken, but by her very remarks Braverman proves she is not the person to fix it. A university's main aim is - or should be - to replace an empty mind with an open, enquiring one, and the main skills a graduate should leave with are the ability to learn independently and to think critically. Subject specific knowledge is an added bonus and may or may not be useful in a subsequent career whereas being able to learn and to think are useful whatever you end up doing. The stuff that gets derided as "Mickey Mouse" degrees are the very subjects that are often chosen by prospective students because they find those topics interesting. Studying what really interests you is a great way to develop independent learning and critical thinking, developing that open and enquring mind. If study is a chore because you've been suckered into reading for a degree because it's deemed a useful subject aimed towards a good career rather than because the subject interests you can make it harder to really want to dig in and develop these skills. You can then use those skills to acquire appropriate knowledge for whatever career you go in to, if the original degree subject is not relevant. Judging the intrinsic "value" of a degree by how much someone holding it happens to earn is contrary to the real purpose of a university education.
"The stuff that gets derided as "Mickey Mouse" degrees are the very subjects that are often chosen by prospective students because they find those topics interesting." Well student interest though it may be valuable in a largely marketised system, can not be the driver of what higher education offers. Indeed, most disciplines contain areas of knowledge and skill that are difficult to acquire and need ard slog (itself an important aspect of work and study) as degree level study is meant to be difficult though rewarding. It we let student interest determine the kind of degrees we offer, as to some extent we do, we end up with a mess. I am not a fan of SB at all, and we should be alarmed by some of her comments, but I do think much of what we offer has been substantially dumbed down over the years to pander to student demand, but others may have a different view of course. In this we have only ourselves to blame.
I tend to agree on the whole. It's not just the degree subjects but their content that becomes the issue. In Humanities long and difficult texts that require sustained reading are often avoided, as are texts from earlier periods. It is often remarked that students opt to study texts that only relate to and reflect their own life experiences, generally contemporary rather than those required for the nature of the subject. This process is re-inforced though the internal student satisfaction protocols etc. In some areas students determine what they are taught.
Fortunately, and contrary to the language of media and politician coverage, there is not one "education system" in the UK state - there are several, with some overlaps but also quite significant distinctions including devolved legislatures, governance arrangements and even major structural curriculum differences (in the case of Scotland, which follows the European pattern rather than the English outlier, as constitutionally enshrined in the Acts of Union). The existence of systems of semi-proportional representation and wider electorates for the devolved legislatures (eg embracing more non-UK nationalities than that for Westminster) makes it harder and less ikely that the likes of educational neanderthals like Reform UK will get their hands on the levers of educational change outside England. Mike Picken, Glasgow
Well it's good to know that the Scottish HE system is thriving under those advanced SNP homo sapiens! By the way I don't think that we generally consider it appropriate to use the term neanderthal in a pejoratve sense. Anyone got a used camper van for sale by the way?
Green Party will wipe out existing student debt and abolish student loans.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT