色盒直播

How did BPP University become a 拢2.5 billion behemoth?

Partnerships and flexibility seen as key to company鈥檚 continued growth but others may struggle to follow in its path

Published on
August 23, 2024
Last updated
August 23, 2024
Four associates celebrate a successful day's business by treating themselves to a lunchtime bottle of white wine to illustrate How BPP became a 拢2.5bn behemoth
Source: In Pictures Ltd/Corbis/Getty Images

The price tag placed on one of the UK鈥檚 largest private universities as it聽prepares to go back up for sale聽this autumn has raised some eyebrows.

At 拢2.5 billion, BPP Education Group 鈥 which includes BPP University and a wider apprenticeship and professional training offer 鈥 will cost any potential suitor more than triple the 拢700 million its current owner, TDR Capital, paid just three years ago.

While insiders said the price was reflective of a spike in appetite to invest in private higher education, the group remains a rarity in the UK system: one of only three for-profit providers operating at the same scale as a traditional public university, along with the University of Law and Arden University.

Its development has run in parallel to the country鈥檚 changing regulatory environment, with BPP among the first of its kind to secure trappings such as a聽university title聽and taught degree-awarding powers, although it has聽fared less well in new initiatives such as the Teaching Excellence Framework.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

Those involved in building up the company attributed聽its success to聽its relentless focus on industry partnerships, graduate employability and international students,聽a long time before the rest of the sector caught up.

鈥淚t was my complete annoyance that everybody kept moving into my territory,鈥 said Carl Lygo, the founding vice-chancellor of BPP University who now runs Arden. 鈥淭alking about employment, talking about employers, doing bespoke programmes. All of that we were doing in the 1990s and 2000s before it became super-popular, and the government of the day started pushing a similar approach.鈥

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

Named after the surnames of its three founders 鈥 Alan Brierley, Richard Price and Charles Prior 鈥 BPP initially found success as a training college for accountants, but it was the development of its law school that drove its expansion.

In what was seen as a big turning point in the mid-2000s, the then fledgling school worked with some of the UK鈥檚 leading law firms to revamp the Legal Practice Course (LPC) that was widely seen as being no longer fit for purpose, eventually securing exclusivity deals to teach the trainees of some 60 companies.

This fuelled expansion across the UK 鈥 with study centres opened in major cities including Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham and Bristol 鈥 and attracted a boom in overseas enrolments.

鈥淲e were constantly developing links with decision-makers in law firms,鈥 said Professor Lygo. 鈥淟istening to concerns about current provision, designing things that met those issues and then playing it back to them. It took a few years to gain their trust and convince them that we could do it 鈥 a big investment in people, time and eventually real estate.鈥

The law school also drove the institution to jump through the regulatory hoops after it failed to find a university partner to run a master鈥檚 degree programme and decided instead to go it alone, eventually being granted indefinite taught degree-awarding powers in 2020.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

In more recent years however, law has become less of a focus for BPP. It closed its undergraduate programme in 2018 in part due to wholesale changes to legal education, with the introduction of the Solicitors Qualifying Exam that will eventually replace the LPC, a move聽that many believe will fuel competition in the market.

Accounts for the university part of the business for the year ending August 2023 show an increased turnover of 拢67.3 million, attributed primarily to growth in enrolments in its other schools: business and nursing. In the wider BPP group, apprenticeship provision and the selling of study materials worldwide have proven key growth areas.

Brooke Storer-Church, the chief executive of mission group GuildHE 鈥 which counts BPP as one of its members 鈥 said it had shown the value of vocational, technical and professionally led programmes and the 鈥渄iversity and strength that this brings to the UK higher education sector offer鈥.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

But the success of BPP as a private provider remains an exception in the UK sector, said Chris Millward, a former director of fair access and participation at the English regulator, the Office for Students, who added that most other private providers continue to operate at a very small scale, with the majority having fewer than 1,000 students.

BPP already had the size and brand to manage the regulatory requirements, but many other private providers would see the level of investment needed as off-putting, said Professor Millward, now professor of practice in education policy at the University of Birmingham.

And while the likes of BPP may have influenced the behaviour of university departments that offer similar subjects, the idea that growth in private provision would聽drive innovation and efficiency across the whole sector聽鈥 a key tenet of the 2017 Higher Education and Research Act 鈥 had not proven to be the case.

This, according to Professor Millward, raised questions about how much regulatory resource should continue to be dedicated to developing private provision.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

tom.williams@timeshighereducation.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: How BPP became a 拢2.5bn behemoth

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

携泻褨褋薪邪 褕胁械泄薪邪 褎褍褉薪褨褌褍褉邪 蟹邪 谐褍褉褌芯胁懈屑懈 褑褨薪邪屑懈 蟹褨 褕胁懈写泻芯褞 写芯褋褌邪胁泻芯褞 胁 褨薪褌械褉薪械褌-屑邪谐邪蟹懈薪褨 "袙褋械褌邪泻" 蟹邪 邪写褉械褋芯褞 - https://vcetak.in.ua/
Many universities, including one I where I worked in the 1980s let alone the two where I worked in the 1990s and 2000s, were doing more than talking about employment, employers and bespoke programmes so Carl Lygo and BPP were not the innovators he seems to believe they were.
Many universities, including one I where I worked in the 1980s let alone the two where I worked in the 1990s and 2000s, were doing more than talking about employment, employers and bespoke programmes so Carl Lygo and BPP were not the innovators he seems to believe they were.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT