色盒直播

UK universities spend more than 拢200 million on severance pay

色盒直播 analysis reveals higher education sector has already passed feared milestone of axeing more than 10,000 jobs in a single year

Published on
January 31, 2025
Last updated
January 31, 2025
Queue of people against UK banknote background, illustrating severance payments
Source: Getty Images montage

UK universities鈥 annual spending on severance payments has skyrocketed past 拢200 million, with more than 10,000 staff losing their jobs last year.

Dozens of higher education institutions have announced redundancies and cost-cutting plans in recent months, with one vice-chancellor predicting that 10,000 jobs will be lost across the sector during the current academic year 鈥 but Times Higher Education鈥檚 analysis reveals that this grim milestone was already surpassed, comfortably so, during 2023-24.

Across 103 universities to have posted financial accounts so far this year with relevant figures, 拢210 million was spent on compensation for loss of office last year. This was a 67 per cent increase on the 拢126 million figure for the same institutions in 2022-23.

The severance payments, which do not reflect the whole of the sector, affected about 10,300 employees 鈥 up from 7,300 the year before, and an average of 100 per institution.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

The figures underline the financial pressures facing UK universities battling rising costs, a volatile international recruitment landscape, and a dog-eat-dog domestic market 鈥 but are also likely to raise questions about whether the money could have been better spent keeping academics and higher education professionals in their jobs.

The data clearly demonstrates that universities are focused on 鈥渟ubstantial cost reduction鈥, Phil McNaull, a former finance director at the University of Edinburgh, said.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

This could have been caused by a rapid drop in demand from international students, or some 鈥渙verdue culling鈥 of loss-making courses that were suddenly seen as no longer sustainable, said McNaull, now a strategic finance consultant.

鈥淭he universities should have calculated that a one-off hit last year to buy out staff contracts will result in a sustainable, recurring saving in future annual staff costs. The result should be a more sustainable cost base to serve changing income streams,鈥 he said.

The biggest compensation packages among this group were at the University of Nottingham (拢13.8 million to 408 employees), the University of Central Lancashire (拢10.5 million to 264 employees) and Leeds Beckett University (拢10.3 million to 279 employees).

McNaull said the data suggested that universities were taking the hard decisions to reduce staff numbers in the face of a 鈥減erfect storm鈥 of fast-rising cost increases.

However, he added: 鈥淚f one was being critical, it could represent the unavoidable action to survive now having procrastinated in similar decisions over the years.鈥

Russell Group universities were responsible for a third (拢70 million) of the total severance spend, and around half of the impacted employees.

Martine Garland, formerly a lecturer in marketing at Aberystwyth Business School, said the sector was 鈥渃learly troubled鈥 in 2023-24, but the amount paid out the year before did not paint a good picture either.

Garland said institutions would not feel the benefit聽of removing a staff member from the salary bill until the value of the severance pay has worked its course.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淕iving someone six months鈥 severance pay in January means you won鈥檛 see a saving until July. So possibly the 2022-23 cuts were not deep enough to stave off the need for more in 2023-24.鈥

RankProviderSeverance pay (拢), 2023-24Severance pay (拢), 2022-23

罢贬贰鈥檚听analysis found that the average compensation awarded to employees let go from Russell Group institutions was much lower than that in the rest of the sector.

鈥淲hat this says to me is that, with the exception of Nottingham, the Russell Group have been shedding lower-paid facilities and support staff whereas the others have been cutting from much higher pay grades,鈥 said Garland.

鈥淚t would suggest the ones with the bigger payouts are in more trouble and thus cutting at the core of their operations.鈥

The 拢13.8 million spent by Nottingham was up from 拢1.4 million across 126 employees the year before. 鈥淪teps have been taken to manage the cost base in year and a voluntary severance scheme was concluded which will improve our ongoing operational efficiency,鈥澛.

Graham Baldwin, Uclan鈥檚 vice-chancellor, said he was pleased that the institution had been able聽to bring people costs to a 鈥渟ustainable level鈥 through voluntary rather than compulsory redundancies. The investment in achieving the cost savings has a payback period of around nine months, he added.

Compensation at Leeds Beckett rose from 拢1.7 million to 拢10.3 million over the same period. It said its voluntary severance scheme was opened to respond to future financial challenges.

鈥淟eeds Beckett moved early to address sector-wide financial issues. Doing so enabled us to avoid compulsory redundancies and subject closures,鈥 it said.

Other institutions with large severance payments for 2023-24 include the universities of Exeter (拢8.8 million), Swansea (拢8.5 million) and Surrey (拢6.7 million).

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

patrick.jack@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

Other Institutions ahead of offering voluntary severance are trying to destroy the work / life balance of staff by mandating an increased return to campus for staff whose roles don't require them to be there. I guess they are hoping some staff will leave of their own accord (which is happening) saving on the posts and not having to pay out severance.
Staff are leaving, fed up with low pay, high workloads and reduced hours /points (WAM) to complete the work. People are on their knees, but not sure anyone cares.
We found that the voluntary severance scheme was offered to all with the comment that anyone who applied would get it. This triggered a rush of applications whilst people sought alternative work. After the scheme closed, a sizeable chunk of those people were denied VS but had found other work so left anyway. This left critical gaps in delivery and resulted in many people remaining being landed with unsustainable workloads. Consequently sickness absence increased, exacerbating a downwards spiral. Some senior managers did extraordinarily well out of the scheme and even managed to sneak back in as "employees of contracting companies" to work around a 3 year moratorium on them working for the university again. Harking back to the old days is a mistake. The changes we see now are permanent. I suspect another 10,000 will go this year. Courses will be killed off, departments will merge. Schools will form in faculties, resulting in lower paid staff being lost and others seeing huge workload increases whilst the management class will protect themselves and increase their salaries for lower workloads.
well we need to slash many of the overpaid useless senior managers and their associated teams that have little or no value added. So much excessive bureaucracy in UK Universities and with AI many of the jobs can go on a permanent basis. For the most part Universities are simple to manage, enroll students, collect fees and give them pass//fail marks. Get academics to do research and attract research funds. Instead what has happened is there are way too many bureaucrats doing useless change management to embellish their CVs and many seem to do very little.
Standards should come first and last - and that goes especially for research ...

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT