色盒直播

Pro-colonialism paper: how did it get published?

Published on
September 28, 2017
Last updated
September 28, 2017

We are writing to complain about the recent publication of the article 鈥淭he case for colonialism鈥 by Bruce Gilley in the journal Third World Quarterly (鈥Pro-colonialism paper outcry prompts author to 鈥榬equest withdrawal鈥鈥, www.timeshighereducation.com, 22 September). While we do not believe that the article should have been published in any academic journal, our complaint is in terms of the venue of publication and the editorial process behind its publication, and thus questions of academic rigour, accountability and transparency, as well as the content of the article itself.

While we find the argument and many of the claims made in the article unconvincing and offensive, we are particularly surprised to see such content published in this particular journal, without any real engagement on the part of the author with the critique of colonialism he rejects, or on the part of the journal with some form of introductory framing.

Although the journal鈥檚 aims and scope state that it is 鈥渘ot averse to publishing provocative and exploratory articles鈥, the article鈥檚 argument in favour of colonialism contradicts the origins of the journal 鈥渁s an intellectual venue for anti-colonial thought, to build ideas against colonialism鈥, and its reputation as the 鈥渉ome of the Third World Prize, the Edward Said Prize; the home, in other words, of values against this essay鈥 (as editorial board member Vijay Prashad has stated). Arguments against publishing this particular article in this particular journal are therefore not arguments for censorship or against academic freedom, as the author has tended to argue previously. Rather, there is both a problem of venue and scientific integrity, and such arguments should be submitted elsewhere, and submitted to a process of peer review.

It seems clear that the article shouldn鈥檛 have got through the process of peer review, and therefore shouldn鈥檛 have been published, certainly not in this particular academic journal.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

We are signatories to the change.org petitions, and as well as seeking the paper鈥檚 retraction, we are calling for the editor/s involved to apologise for further brutalising those who have suffered under colonialism. We also ask, for the sake of accountability and transparency, for the editor/s responsible for the publication of this article to justify their decision to publish, to explain the process followed in reaching that decision, and to stand down from their editorial position/s. We believe that such actions are necessary to recompense for the offence that the article has and will cause, and to ensure that such historical revisionism for what is a crime against humanity not go unchecked.

Nadia Atia, Queen Mary University of London

Rahma Bavelaar, University of Amsterdam

Jumana Bayeh, Macquarie University, Sydney Australia

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

Christiaan De Beukelaer, University of Melbourne

Lisa Blackman, Goldsmiths, University of London

V茅ronique Bontemps, CNRS, Paris

Leyla Dakhli, CNRS, Centre Marc Bloch, Berlin

Simon Dawes, Universit茅 de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines

Sonia Dayan-Herzbrun, Universit茅 Paris Diderot-Paris 7

Des Freedman, Goldsmiths, University of London

Claire Gallien, Universit茅 Paul Val茅ry Montpellier 3

Nadia Hakim-Fern谩ndez, researcher at the Future Making Space, Aarhus University

Ahreum Han, discipline of exercise and sport science, the University of Sydney

Virginie Ich茅, Universit茅 Paul Val茅ry Montpellier 3

Umar Suleiman Jahun, School of Media, Film and Music, University of Sussex

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

Nicolas Jaoul, CNRS, Paris

Theodore Koulouris, University of Brighton

Lila Lamrani, Centre Jean P茅pin

Souad Lamrani, Paris-Sorbonne University

Debora Lanzeni, Research Fellow, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

Sara Marino, Bournemouth University

Angelo Martins Jr, Goldsmiths, University of London

Tom Mills, Aston University

Nelly Mok, Universit茅 Paul Val茅ry Montpellier 3

Aur茅lien Mondon, University of Bath

Aris Mousoutzanis, Principal Lecturer in Film and Screen Studies, University of Brighton

Souvik Mukherjee, Presidency University, Kolkata

Patricia Prieto-Blanco, Lecturer, School of Media, University of Brighton, UK

Nabila Ramdani, Journalist & Academic

Andreas Rauh Ortega, University of Leeds

Chris Roberts, University of Roehampton, London

Reuben Ross, Doctoral Candidate, Universidade Cat贸lica Portuguesa

Claire Savina, Research Associate University of Oxford

Maria Sakellari, Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellow, School of Media, University of Brighton

Andrea Schmidt, Willamette University

Elisa Serafinelli, University of Sheffield

Jon Solomon, Universit茅 Jean Moulin Lyon 3

Jacquie Tinkler, Charles Sturt University

Gavan Titley, National University of Ireland, Maynooth


Send to

Letters should be sent to:聽色盒直播.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in聽Times Higher Education聽should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

色盒直播

ADVERTISEMENT

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

Surely, Third World Quarterly was precisely the place to publish 鈥淭he case for colonialism鈥, where it can be most critically examined, rather than being hidden away somewhere it is unlikely to be challenged?

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT